Who this is for: Coaches planning in-season arm care, pitchers looking for a way to recover between outings when the standard timeline feels like too much too soon, and parents trying to get their athletes to perform at their best every time they take the field.
The In-Season Arm Care article built the Prepare–Compete–Restore framework—the organizing structure for keeping arms healthy and available through a full season. The article on confined-space throwing covered how throwing sock work trains the posterior shoulder at near-game arm speeds. Both of those articles belong in your reading stack. If you haven't read the In-Season Arm Care article yet, start there. This article assumes you know what Prepare, Compete, and Restore mean, and why Restore matters.
This article is about what to do when the arm needs more time. Most pitchers can move from a game outing into sock-based deceleration work the next day and ramp up from there. But some arms need a more gradual approach—either because of a heavier workload, a shorter turnaround, or a pattern of posterior shoulder soreness that lingers longer than it should. That is where a weighted forearm sleeve earns its place. It adds load to the arm without requiring a throw, slows arm speed to keep stress low, and gives coaches a tool to build back even more conservatively when the standard timeline is not the right fit.
1. What the Arm Is Actually Doing When It Decelerates
Pitching generates some of the fastest joint motion ever measured in the human body. The shoulder rotates at 7,000 degrees per second or more during the acceleration phase—that's roughly 19 full rotations per second. After the ball leaves the hand, the arm has to stop. That stopping process happens in a window that is often shorter than the acceleration that produced it.
During that braking phase, the muscles on the back of the shoulder and the flexors of the elbow are doing the work. They lengthen while still under tension—the same way a car's brakes apply friction against motion to slow it down. When this system is working well, the whole body shares that load: the hips and trunk keep rotating through release, the back of the shoulder fires, the elbow stays soft and bent, and the arm comes to a controlled stop. When it breaks down—the trunk stops early, the elbow straightens out, the arm yanks across the body—the load gets concentrated in structures that weren't designed to handle it alone.
There are two layers to how well that braking system performs. The first is how strong the muscles are. The second is how quickly they can fire. A muscle can be strong but slow to engage. In the deceleration phase of a pitch, the arm is already moving at thousands of degrees per second. If the brakes engage a fraction of a second too late, it doesn't matter how strong they are—the joint takes the hit before the muscles get there. This quality—how fast the braking system can switch on during a rapid, high-speed movement—is called eccentric rate of force development, or eccentric RFD. Think of it as the quickness of the brakes, not just the strength of them.
Most arm care programs build eccentric strength through band work, rows, and external rotation exercises. Those tools build the foundation. But they don't specifically train how quickly the braking system fires under high-speed conditions. That requires the arm to actually move—and to absorb a braking demand at a speed that is closer to what the sport requires.
Quick note here: The throwing sock trains deceleration at near-game arm speeds, and for a healthy arm with a normal workload, that is the right place to start. But for the arm that needs something more conservative—heavier pitch count, lingering posterior shoulder soreness, a shorter turnaround than usual—the weighted forearm sleeve fills that gap. It trains the same deceleration pattern through a real throwing motion, just at a lower arm speed and with less total stress. That is what makes it the right regression tool when the standard path is too much too soon. One is not necessarily better than the other. They each have their own place in individual programs.
2. Why the Weighted Forearm Sleeve Works on Two Levels
Picture a pitcher the day after a start. His arm is sore in the familiar way—not injured, just worked. The tissue is in the middle of its recovery process. The posterior shoulder absorbed thousands of braking loads the night before. He needs to move, because sitting still is not how tissue rebuilds. But he is not ready to throw, because the demand of an actual throw—even a light one—may be more than where his arm is right now.
That is the exact problem the weighted forearm sleeve is built for. It addresses recovery on two levels at the same time.
The first is effort. With the sleeve on at low intent—dry throws, ball holds, submaximal movement—the arm is moving slower than it does in a game. The peak loading event during deceleration is smaller. The tissue is being asked to work, but not at the level that created the soreness in the first place. That calibration matters. Asking a recovering arm to absorb the same demand it absorbed yesterday is not progressive loading—it is repeated stress.
The second is the mechanical environment. Reduced effort alone is not enough. An athlete can move slowly with poor mechanics and still put stress in the wrong places. What the sleeve adds is a specific set of conditions alongside the reduced effort: the weight stays on the arm the entire time, keeping the posterior chain engaged throughout the motion, encouraging the elbow to stay bent through the finish rather than snapping straight, and distributing the braking demand gradually across the whole motion rather than letting it concentrate at one moment. The arm is doing real deceleration work, not just going through the motions.
Both levels work together. The effort keeps the demand appropriate for where the tissue is. The mechanical environment makes sure that demand is doing something useful. That combination is what separates this from simply throwing easy—and it is why the sleeve fits in a recovery window in a way that unloaded movement cannot replicate.
3. How Distal Forearm Loading Works
Distal loading means adding weight toward the end of the lever—in this case, the forearm. That placement creates the greatest effect on how hard the arm is starting and stopping, without adding higher stress directly to the shoulder joint. Adding weight to the forearm increases what physicists call the arm's moment of inertia—essentially, the arm becomes harder to accelerate and harder to decelerate. At full throwing effort, that would increase stress. But distal loading with the weighted forearm sleeve is not used at full effort. It is used in dry throws, ball holds, and very light throwing, where the total demand stays low.
The most important mechanical feature of distal loading is that the weight stays on the arm the entire time. It never leaves. This distinguishes it from the throwing sock—where the ball is released and the sock or tether creates a sudden braking impulse at the end of the throw. With a weighted forearm sleeve, the eccentric demand builds gradually from cocking through follow-through, rather than arriving as a sudden distraction force at the end. That gradual build is what makes it appropriate for the earliest, most conservative stages of recovery or warm-up.
Ron Wolforth describes the problem that this addresses clearly: the baseball weighs five ounces, and when it leaves the hand, the hand speeds up. The arm can get a pulling or straightening sensation—tugging on soft tissue in a position where it can't protect itself well. He compares it to tennis: a tennis player holds on to the racket through the finish of a stroke, and that held mass keeps the arm from straightening out and stopping short. Adding weight to the forearm borrows the same idea. The arm tends to stay bent through the finish because there is something to keep it there, and the back of the shoulder has more time and more reason to contribute to the braking work.
There is also a feel component that matters in practice. The added weight on the forearm gives the arm a clearer sense of where it is in space during the finish—a signal that helps athletes find and hold a soft-elbow position without a coach having to cue it every throw. That proprioceptive feedback is especially useful during recovery work, when the focus should be on quality of movement rather than effort.
4. The Research Foundation
A. What the Deceleration Phase Actually Demands
The numbers are worth knowing once, so here they are: shortly after ball release, the shoulder experiences compressive force equivalent to roughly 245 pounds pushing into the joint. That is the deceleration phase—and it is where the arm is most vulnerable, not during acceleration.
What determines whether those forces are manageable or damaging is how well the whole system shares the load. The elbow is part of that picture. When it stays soft and bent through the finish, the lever arm is shorter, the muscles have better mechanical position to do their job, and the braking work stays with the tissue that can handle it. When the elbow snaps straight, the lever gets longer, the mechanical advantage disappears, and the load shifts toward the ligaments and capsule instead of the muscle.
But the elbow position is really just setting the conditions for the posterior shoulder and scapular muscles to do their job. Those are the structures that actually brake the arm—the rotator cuff on the back of the shoulder, the muscles that control and stabilize the shoulder blade, the elbow flexors. They are working eccentrically—lengthening under tension—every single pitch. The research is consistent on two things: the demands on this system during deceleration are high, and most arm care programs underinvest in training it specifically.
B. The Speed of the Brakes Matters
Research on how quickly athletes can produce force—eccentric RFD—has found that baseball and football players score notably higher in this quality than athletes in other sports when tested on force plates. That reflects the demands of their sport: high-speed, ballistic movements that require the body to decelerate rapidly. A 2019 study comparing different types of eccentric training found that faster eccentric movements increased RFD by 10 to 19 percent and increased muscle fascicle length—meaning the individual muscle fibers gained working length, giving them more range over which to absorb force. Slower eccentric training primarily increased muscle size. For a sport like baseball, where the braking event happens in milliseconds, training the speed of the eccentric response matters as much as training the overall strength of it.
C. Weighted Pitching Sleeve Research
A four-week study on collegiate-aged baseball players compared a group using a weighted pitching sleeve during their throwing program to a group following a standard throwing program. The sleeve group showed improvements in external-rotation shoulder strength and power—the qualities most directly associated with decelerating the arm—while the standard group declined in those same measures over the same period. No meaningful differences in throwing velocity appeared between the groups. The study's sample was small, so the findings are best understood as supporting evidence rather than definitive proof. But they are consistent with the mechanical argument: incorporating a weighted forearm sleeve into a throwing program can support the posterior shoulder's strength and power without negatively affecting performance.
D. What Happens to the Arm After an Outing
Research measuring muscle damage markers after pitching shows that creatine kinase—a protein that leaks into the bloodstream when muscle fibers are damaged—is significantly elevated after an outing and takes 48 to 72 hours to trend back toward normal levels. Think of creatine kinase as a rough indicator of how much micro-damage the muscles absorbed. That damage is normal. It is also the signal that the tissue needs time and progressive loading to rebuild properly—not complete rest, and not immediately jumping back into high-stress throwing.
Active recovery—low-intensity movement that keeps blood flowing to the affected tissue—consistently outperforms complete rest for managing soreness and supporting tissue repair. The four-day progression below is built on this principle: rather than resting and then returning to throwing, the arm is walked through a calibrated sequence of progressively increasing loads, so that the tissue is being actively rebuilt rather than simply waiting.
5. Where the Weighted Forearm Sleeve Fits in the PCR System
For most pitchers with a typical recovery window, the standard Restore path works like this: after an outing, the arm gets gradual movement, blood flow, and range of motion work, then low-intensity sock throwing begins the next day to stimulate blood flow, reinforce deceleration patterns, and start the tissue recovery process. It is effective, it is time-efficient, and for most arms in most schedules, it is the right tool for the job.
The weighted forearm sleeve is not a replacement for that path. It is a step below it—a more conservative option for situations where the standard approach is too much too soon. If an athlete is dealing with a heavier workload, a shorter turnaround, a flare-up in posterior shoulder soreness, or is returning from a higher-than-normal pitch count, the weighted forearm sleeve gives the arm a way to do meaningful deceleration work at a lower stress level than the throwing sock produces.
This tool is most accurately described as a regression option within the Restore phase, not the first move. A well-recovered arm doesn't necessarily need to start with forearm loading. But an arm that needs more time, more conservatism, or a more deliberate rebuilding process does.
Prepare: Proprioceptive Warm-Up When Space or Time Is Limited
In the Prepare phase, the primary goal is building arm readiness through progressive warm-up. Dynamic movement, band work, and progressive catch lead that process. A weighted forearm sleeve adds a targeted role when those options are limited—no partner, no space, or a routine that needs to stay compact. Dry throws with the sleeve allow the athlete to feel the deceleration finish position clearly before a ball is introduced. The slower arm speed makes the soft-elbow finish more deliberate and easier to feel. Effort in Prepare stays at 2–3 out of 10—effortless, smooth, focused on feel. This is preparation, not training.
Compete: Staying Loose Between Innings Without a Partner
Between innings, the practical problem is staying warm without adding stress to an arm that is already working. Dry throws with a weighted forearm sleeve require no partner and no net. Ball holds—moving through a full throwing motion while keeping the ball in the hand—maintain arm readiness without any of the acceleration forces that stress the inside of the elbow and the front of the shoulder. The between-inning application requires nothing beyond the sleeve itself. It fits in a dugout, a tunnel, or the back of a bullpen mound.
Restore: The Conservative Entry Point When the Arm Needs More Time
For athletes who need a more gradual approach, the weighted forearm sleeve opens an earlier, lower-stress entry point. Before a single throw is made, dry throws and ball holds with the weighted forearm sleeve can begin stimulating blood flow, training the deceleration pattern, and loading the posterior chain eccentrically—without adding unnecessary valgus stress at the elbow or the distraction forces at the shoulder that even a submaximal throw produces. It is deceleration work without throwing. The four-day sample progression below maps out how an athlete can use this approach—building from dry throws on Day 1 to full throwing on Day 4, with the sleeve moderating the arm's speed and stress level throughout.
6. The Gradual-Return Restore Progression
This four-day structure is designed for pitchers with no current shoulder or elbow pain who need a more conservative path back from an outing. For any athlete in formal rehabilitation, medical staff should direct the return-to-throwing timeline. This is a framework for healthy arms, not a rehab protocol.
Use this progression when: the standard recovery timeline feels too aggressive, posterior shoulder soreness is higher than normal, the workload from the last outing was heavier than usual, or the schedule is tighter than ideal. If the arm feels good and the standard timeline is working, move to the throwing sock the next day as the In-Season Arm Care article describes.
Rules across all four days:
- Stop immediately if the athlete reports sharp, pinching, catching, or "stuck" sensations in the elbow or shoulder. Those are not normal soreness signals.
- Comfortable muscle fatigue in the back of the shoulder after a session is normal. Pain in the joint is not.
- Effort levels are described relative to the athlete's current-season fastball. A 2/10 feels nearly effortless. A 4/10 is clearly submaximal and controlled.
- If the arm doesn't feel ready to move to the next day's work, repeat the current day before progressing.
Day 1 — Dry Throws (Sleeve On, No Ball)
Purpose: Get blood moving to the posterior shoulder. Start light tissue loading. Reestablish the soft-elbow deceleration pattern without throwing a baseball at all.
Why it works: With the weighted forearm sleeve and no ball in the hand, the muscles responsible for accelerating the arm do minimal work. The muscles responsible for braking the arm work to control the weighted forearm through the finish position over and over. Blood flow increases to the tissue that was stressed in the outing. The sleeve's weight makes it easy to feel and maintain a soft-elbow finish, which reinforces the movement quality that will carry forward into actual throwing.
Execution: Make slow, partial throwing motions without a ball. Check: is the elbow soft? Is the hand roughly in line with or slightly outside the shoulder? Is the trunk still rotating? Allow the arm to finish across the body naturally, letting the sleeve's weight keep the elbow gently bent.
Volume and effort — 13–16U: 10–12 reps, 1 set, 2/10 effort. Can be repeated 2–3 times throughout the day at this intensity.
Volume and effort — 17U–college: 12–15 reps, 1–2 sets, 2/10 effort, 60–90 seconds rest between sets.
Back off if: Soreness is higher than expected—drop to 6–8 reps. Stop if any sharp or joint-specific pain appears.
Day 2 — Ball Holds (Sleeve On, No Throw)
Purpose: Add more load to the deceleration side of the arm without introducing more of the acceleration-phase stress that comes with an actual throw.
Why it works: A ball hold is a full throwing motion performed while keeping the ball in the hand rather than releasing it. Because the athlete is now gripping an actual baseball and putting more intent behind the movement, it is a natural step up from dry throws. The arm goes through the same cocking, acceleration, and follow-through sequence—but by holding on through what would be the release point, the athlete eliminates the forward snap and keeps the work concentrated in the deceleration side. The posterior chain—the back of the shoulder, the elbow flexors—has to work through the entire finish with both the ball and the sleeve adding load.
Execution: With the sleeve on and a baseball gripped in the throwing hand, make a full throwing motion from the cocked position all the way through to a complete finish—without releasing the ball. Let the motion flow continuously the same way a real throw would.
Volume and effort — 13–16U: 8–10 holds, 1 set.
Volume and effort — 17U–college: 10–12 holds, 1–2 sets, 90 seconds rest between sets. A 5–7 oz weighted ball can be used instead of a standard baseball if more load is appropriate.
Back off if: Any elevated or joint-specific fatigue appears rather than normal muscular tiredness. Reduce the range of motion or return to Day 1 dry throws only.
Day 3 — Submaximal Throws (Sleeve On, Into Net or Sock)
Purpose: Reintroduce actual throwing. The arm is moving again—but still with the sleeve on, which keeps arm speed and intent lower than an unweighted throw and continues to shape the deceleration finish.
Why it works: By Day 3, the initial inflammatory response from the outing has largely passed. The arm is ready to throw, but not yet ready to throw without any load moderation. Keeping the sleeve on means the arm still carries the weight through the finish—reinforcing the soft-elbow pattern and preventing the arm from jumping into a full-speed finish before it has been adequately prepared.
Execution: Throws into a net, a training sock, or to a partner at 3–4/10 effort. Focus: soft elbow, smooth finish, good quality movement patterns.
Volume and effort — 13–16U: 1 set of 8–10 throws, 3–5 second reset between throws, 60–90 seconds rest after the set.
Volume and effort — 17U–college: 2 sets of 8–10 throws (16–20 total), 90 seconds between sets.
Back off if: Accelerated fatigue, soreness, or tiredness appears. Regress to Day 2 ball holds if the finish becomes forced or mechanics break down.
Day 4 — Return to Full Throwing (Sleeve Off)
Purpose: The sleeve comes off. The arm returns to normal throwing—catch, long toss, or bullpen—having been walked back through three days of progressive loading.
Why it works: Three days of increasing eccentric demand have built blood flow, reinforced the deceleration pattern, and graduated the arm from no throwing to submaximal throwing. The posterior shoulder has been actively loaded every day of the recovery window, not just rested. By Day 4, the arm has earned a return to full throwing in a way that passive rest cannot replicate.
Execution: Standard warm-up and pre-throwing routine. Progress to whatever volume and intent is appropriate for the day based on schedule and how the arm feels. No sleeve. Pay attention to how the posterior shoulder feels compared to normal post-throw muscle tiredness.
Volume and effort: Per the athlete's normal routine and coaching staff direction. If the arm still doesn't feel ready at full effort, do another Day 3 session and reassess the following day.
A note on scheduling: This four-day structure fits a standard week between appearances. Athletes with a shorter turnaround—pitching every two or three days—should work with their coach to compress or adjust the progression. The most important principle is that the arm is moving with purpose every day of the recovery window, not just waiting for the next start.
7. Guardrails: Who Should Use It—and Who Should Not
Use this approach if:
- The athlete is physically mature and has no current shoulder or elbow pain.
- The arm needs a more gradual path back from an outing than the standard throwing sock progression provides.
- There is a tendency to straighten the elbow at the finish, and the proprioceptive feedback of the weight helps correct that pattern.
- A structured post-outing recovery option is needed that works without a partner, a field, or a full facility.
Do not use this approach if:
- The athlete is still developing physically and structurally. For most athletes roughly 13 and under, 16 ounces of forearm weight is heavy enough to break down the throwing motion itself. The clearest signal: if observable mechanical breakdown happens during dry throws with the sleeve, it does not belong in this athlete's program yet.
- The athlete has current elbow or shoulder pain. That requires evaluation by a qualified medical professional or athletic trainer before any throwing or loading work begins.
- Deceleration problems are rooted in major mechanical issues—severe arm drag, a dropped elbow, significant hip-shoulder timing problems. A weighted forearm sleeve can reinforce a pattern, but it cannot correct a fundamental mechanical breakdown. Coaching has to come first.
- Symptoms go beyond normal post-throw soreness: sharp pain, a catching sensation, a feeling of instability, or anything that pops or clicks.
For parents: If your athlete comes home from a session saying the shoulder or elbow felt stuck, popped, or hurt more than normal soreness, pause weighted forearm sleeve work and check in with a qualified athletic trainer or medical professional before the next session. Comfortable muscle tiredness in the back of the shoulder after deceleration work is normal. Sharp, pinching, catching, or lingering joint pain is not.
Framed this way—conservative, targeted, age-aware, and positioned as a regression option rather than a default—this tool stays in the category of thoughtful practice rather than trendy gadget.
Next Step
Everything in this article builds on the system described in the In-Season Arm Care article. That article covers the full PCR framework—how Prepare, Compete, and Restore work together across a week, a road trip, and a full season. If you haven't read it yet, that is the right place to start. It will give the four-day progression above a home in a broader plan, show how distal loading connects with band work, oscillation training, and water-based tools, and explain why Restore is the phase most coaches underinvest in.
Annotated Bibliography
[1] Oates Specialties. (2026, January 31). In-season arm care for pitchers: Low-tech tools to stay ready all season. Oates Specialties Blog. Read article
Establishes the Prepare–Compete–Restore framework as the organizing structure for in-season arm care. Defines Restore as the most underinvested phase and provides the full-season context within which the four-day progression operates.
[2] Fleisig, G. S., Andrews, J. R., Dillman, C. J., & Escamilla, R. F. (1995). Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 23(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300218
Foundational biomechanics study documenting 1,090 N of shoulder compressive force shortly after ball release and quantifying deceleration-phase loads. Establishes that soft-elbow mechanics at and after release reduce load concentration at the joint—the mechanical basis for deceleration-focused training.
[3] Wolforth Throwing Mentorship: Article 33. (2023, December 21). Perfect Game USA. https://www.perfectgame.org/articles/view.aspx?article=22584
Discusses how posterior shoulder and back-of-elbow complaints in pitchers frequently reflect deceleration inefficiencies rather than simple overuse. Frames building deceleration capacity as a prerequisite for durable velocity and supports the eccentric RFD rationale for deceleration-specific training.
[4] Myers, W., George, C., McRae, H., & McMahan, A. (2019). Effects of a weighted pitching sleeve on range of motion, shoulder strength, and throwing velocity in collegiate-aged baseball players. Perpetua: The UAH Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3(2), Article 3. https://louis.uah.edu/perpetua/vol3/iss2/3
Four-week study in which a pitching-sleeve group demonstrated increased external-rotation strength and power while a control group declined in both measures. No significant velocity differences between groups. Findings are considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive given sample size. Supports the sleeve as a strength- and power-maintaining tool during in-season throwing programs.
[5] Escamilla, R. F., & Andrews, J. R. (2009). Shoulder muscle recruitment patterns and related biomechanics during upper extremity sports. Sports Medicine, 39(7), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939070-00004
Comprehensive biomechanics review documenting posterior cuff and scapular stabilizer demands during the deceleration phase. Supports the specific targeting of external rotators and posterior shoulder in deceleration-focused training.
[6] Baseball Pitching Training with the Weighted Forearm Sleeve. (2025, January 21). Texas Baseball Ranch. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDFYxXiVLgI
Ron Wolforth explains the mechanical problem: the 5-oz ball leaves at release, the hand speeds up, and the arm can get a pulling-straight sensation. Contrasts baseball with tennis and explains how distal forearm mass encourages a flexed elbow and improved deceleration.
[7] Diffendaffer, A. Z., Bagwell, M. S., Fleisig, G. S., et al. (2023). The clinician's guide to baseball pitching biomechanics. Sports Health. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9950989/
Notes that specific exercises targeting shoulder external rotators to eccentrically control the arm during deceleration are directly relevant to arm care programming. Supports integration of deceleration drills into routine throwing programs.
[8] Sullivan, R. (2019, March 28). Eccentric biceps is the devil for a throwing athlete. Florida Baseball ARMory Blog. https://floridabaseballarmory.com/eccentric-biceps-is-the-devil-for-a-throwing-athlete/
Randy Sullivan (MPT, CSCS) explains that the posterior musculature must be trained eccentrically, at speed, while the shoulder is being distracted—conditions that band and row exercises do not replicate. Provides anatomical rationale for forearm flexor and posterior cuff eccentric work in task-specific contexts.
[9] Zaras, N. D., Stasinaki, A. N., Methenitis, S. K., et al. (2019). Rate of force development, muscle architecture, and performance in young competitive track and field throwers. Sports, 7(2), 41. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/2/41
Fast-velocity eccentric training increased RFD by 10–19% and fascicle length significantly; slow-velocity eccentric training primarily increased muscle thickness. Supports using distal loading at reduced intent as a more sport-relevant eccentric RFD stimulus than slow, isolated resistance exercises.
[10] Laffaye, G., Wagner, P. P., & Tombleson, T. (2014). Countermovement jump height: Gender and sport-specific differences in the force-time variables. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(4), 1096–1105.
Baseball and football players display notably high average eccentric RFD in force-plate testing compared to other sport athletes. Contextualizes eccentric RFD as a sport-specific quality in baseball that must be developed, not assumed.
[11] Varying recovery periods and muscle enzymes in baseball pitchers. (2004). Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1317125/
Creatine kinase levels are significantly elevated after pitching and take 48–72 hours to trend back toward baseline. Supports the biological rationale for the four-day progressive restoration framework and the decision to begin with the lowest-stress intervention on Day 1.
[12] Workload comparison of contemporary interval throwing programs. (2023). International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10564516/
Shows how easily throwing workloads exceed planned targets across interval programs. Underscores the need to treat weighted forearm sleeve work as targeted Restore-day micro-doses—not additional throwing volume layered on top of an already demanding in-season schedule.
About This Analysis
Created by the Oates Specialties team led by Robert Oates, M.Ed., Founder
Editorial oversight by Gunnar Thompson, BS, CSCS, General Manager
Certified Strength & Conditioning Specialist | Biomechanics Specialist
April 2026
Complete Credentials
ROBERT OATES, M.Ed., Founder: Founded Oates Specialties in 2003. Master of Education degree. Provides strategic direction for educational content and athlete development philosophy.
GUNNAR THOMPSON, General Manager: BS Kinesiology (Clinical Exercise Science). CSCS (NSCA), PES (NASM), CPPS certifications. Technical authority on biomechanics and performance science. Conducts review of all educational content for scientific accuracy.
Questions or corrections: gunnart@oatesspecialties.com

